NCW'S False/fabricated Claim exposed regarding 70% women denied maintance on alleged adultrity ground in CRPc125.

The National Commission For Women was founded to be an August body meant to be at the forefront of efforts to empower women and safeguard their rights.

Under the stewardship of the corrupt (petrol pump scam tainted) Girija Vyas , this august body is under the threat of turning into the National Commission For Whores.

Whores? Yes!

Here are are two articles from the times of India that illustrate what I am saying:

• Wives Accused Of Adultery Must Get Alimony: NCW

• Maintenance For Live-In Partner?

This August body has fallen to such low levels as to legitimize live-in relationships and act as the keeper of Indian adulteresses.

In the first article the NCW stated that:

“The commission has recommended that the section that stops a woman from recovering the maintenance amount on the expiry of one year should also be removed. According to NCW, 60-80% women do not receive maintenance despite court orders. “

As a devout Hindu and as an Indian in every possible sense, I felt disgusted by the attempts of the NCW to equate a lawfully wedded woman to a mistress/whore. If these proposals are effected, then the married, devout women of India, will be afforded the same status as a kept woman/mistress of some moron and worse, a filthy adulteress who can claim maintenance for cheating. But then, isn’t this what the radical feminists of India want? to afford legal and unjustified protections to their ilk?

I wondered where the NCW got the numbers they quoted from. On what survey did they base these numbers they quoted?

From thin air apparently.

An enterprising SIFF volunteer filed an RTI to get at the truth and guess what?

There numbers are as real as the virtuousness of the Indian radical feminists !!

Here is the RTI filed by the SIF volunteer: NCW CrPc 125 Proposals RTI Application

Here is the response to the RTI sent by the NCW PIO in jpg format:

The PIO says these numbers came from an in house study of the NCW !! Help. The commission is really staffed by misfits and it is no wonder that it is routinely putting out this kind of a self serving bullshit.

Here is the bullshit conjured by the NCW with regard to the changes to be made to CrPc 125 that would equate a mistress/whore to a wife. That makes me wonder. Will these fatties of the NCW ever learn to make an honest living ?

This is called the present Justice system in India and equal right in India.  

For a wife even adultrity also is not a crime (it is a rewarding option and free money earning business for the whole life), but for a man even an allegation of “Name-calling” is crime and not only the man, his mother/sister/age-old father also can be put behind the bar under 498A or DV act.

Further Reference:

• Maintenance for live-in partner? or Legal Extrotion?

Recognized the “live in relationship” without any prescribed time frame, is nothing but promotion of Animal society, which might have forgotten by our so-called National Commission of Women’s.

So, save family foundation, strongly oppose such “dadagri of NCW” by Ms.Girija Vyas and request our Lawmaker to act immediately amend the CRPC 125 as under:

1. The word men/women to be replaced by the word Person and husband/wife to be replaced by the word Spouse.
2. A well-educated person should earn their live hood by their hard work instead of treating others as a Free ATM machine.
3. The word “living-in-adultiry” to be replaced by the word “living or lived in adultrity” during the relationship of both the partner, should not be entitled for any maintenance from each other, as it is a criminal breach of trust and cheating.
4. If any one filed the maintenance under crpc 125, the person should not be entitled to file or claim any other maintenance case under section24 or DV act.
5. The maximum Limit of Monthly Maintance to be fixed as per Common people's Living Standard only, instead of No limit.

Let wait and see , how our LAW makers react to “NCW’s dadagari” and able to provide and maintain a civilized society of India or create a lot of Father less Child in India also , by promotion of adutrity and  undefined live-in-relationship( only a photo of two partner is sufficient  to define the live-in-relationship).

So, Save family foundation and all their sibling associations urge to the LAW maker to ake the LAW without any Gender bias and without any assumption that all the women born in Raja Harish Chandra family (never lie) and all the men born in Criminal family.